
The
Duty of Fair Representation
Unions are the exclusive representatives of the workers in
the bargaining unit. This role of representative carries with it the
responsibility to fairly represent all members of the bargaining unit,
regardless of the race, color, sex, political views within the union,
and even regardless of whether or not they belong to the union.
Failure to fairly represent all workers can subject the union to a
lawsuit from a worker who believes that he or she was discriminated
against by the union. The Supreme Court has held that the union
breeches its duty of fair representation when its actions are
"arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith".
To ensure that the union is fulfilling its obligation to
fairly represent the workers, a local union should follow some
guidelines. These include:
·
When
you are approached about a grievance, do a full investigation.
Interview the grievant and all witnesses. Review the contract to see
if there are any potential violations. Request all relevant
information from management. Keep detailed records of your
investigation.
·
Do
not refuse to file a grievance because of race, sex, religion,
politics, personality, or membership status. You must represent all
members of the bargaining unit regardless of your personal opinion of
the worker involved in the grievance.
·
Treat grievant’s as you would want to be treated if it were your
grievance. Keep them up to date on the progress of their grievances.
Don’t disregard a grievance simply because the grievant has filed a
number of frivolous grievances in the past.
·
If
you decide to drop a grievance, notify the worker prior to formally
removing the grievance. Give the grievant a specified time to provide
additional relevant information. Keep records of conversations and
written material used to notify the grievant that his or her case is
being dropped.
·
Prepare thoroughly for all arbitrations. Simply taking a case to
arbitration is not a defense against a DFR charge if the union does
not prepare for the arbitration.
Duty of Fair
Representation Questionnaire
1. We are grieving a one-day suspension. The grievant wants
us to go to arbitration, but this could cost the union $2,000 in legal
expenses. It seems foolish to spend this much money for one day’s pay,
especially when the union is low on funds. Do we have to arbitrate?
Yes ____ No ____
2. A worker was suspended for two weeks because of
absenteeism. At the third step of the grievance procedure, the company
offered one week’s back pay. We thing this is a reasonable settlement,
but the employee wants us to go to arbitration to get full back pay.
If we accept the company’s offer, can the employee sue us?
Yes ____ No ____
3. Several female employees have complained about sexual
harassment from a supervisor. We have a non-discrimination clause in
the contract and deferral of a grievance pending completion of an EEO
complaint. I’d rather not file a grievance and just let them go
through EEO, because I am afraid that the company will get its back
up, and this will jeopardize several other important grievances that
are currently pending a decision. Can we do this?
Yes ____ No ____
4. Our contract says that employees must serve a 90-day
probationary period. Do we have to represent them during this time?
Yes ____ No ____
5. Two employees were suspended for one week for serious
insubordination. At the first step of the grievance procedure, the
company offered to reinstate one employee with back pay if we dropped
the grievance of the second worker. Can we do this without risking a
DFR suit?
Yes ____ No ____
6. We filed a grievance against a letter of warning. At the
grievance meeting, the company presented good reasons for its actions.
Do we have to make fools of ourselves by pursuing this grievance?
Yes ____ No ____
7. We filed a grievance for a member who now wants it
withdrawn. The union thinks it is an important issue. Can we keep it
alive without the grievant’s permission?
Yes ____ No ____
8. We voted not to take an insubordination grievance to
arbitration, because we were afraid of losing the case and setting a
bad precedent. The worker says she is willing to pay the arbitration
expenses herself and to hire her own attorney. Under these
circumstances, can the union still refuse to allow the case to go to
arbitration?
Yes ____ No ____
9. We lost an arbitration over a discharge. The worker wants
us to appeal the arbitrator’s decision to court. Our lawyer says this
would be useless, but the employee is threatening to sue the union if
we don’t do it. Should we file the appeal?
Yes ____ No ____
10. If we decide not to arbitrate a grievance, how long does
an employee have is she wants to file a DFR suit against the union?
6 months ____ One year ____ Two years ____ No limit ____
11. If a worker files a DFR suit, can she sue her steward
along with the union?
Yes ____ No ____
12. Two members get into a fight. One is clearly at fault but
both are suspended and want to file grievances. Can we refuse to take
the grievance of the one who was at fault?
Yes ____ No ____
13. Fred Freeloader is not a union member. What’s worse, he
is constantly bad-mouthing the union. Yesterday he approached his
steward saying that the company had awarded a job posting to someone
with less seniority although Fred had the qualifications. Can we tell
Fred that he must join the union before we’ll represent him?
Yes ____ No ____
14. Last week I missed a time limit for appealing a grievance
to the third step. The company will not let me file it now. I had a
lot on my mind and just forgot even though I thought it was a
legitimate grievance. Can the union be found guilty?
Yes ____ No ____
Duty of Fair
Representation
Answer Sheet
1. Not necessarily. Unions are entitled to consider the
financial costs of arbitration. A union with a small treasury may not
be able to arbitrate a case that a larger union could take on. The
NLRA is not violated when a union, in good faith, declines to
arbitrate for financial reasons. But, cost considerations carry less
weight as the importance of the grievance increases. Discharge cases
are the most important. Unless the case is hopeless, a union will be
hard pressed to justify a decision not to arbitrate solely because of
the expense.
2. Not successfully. A union is allowed to compromise a
grievance, as long as it has good reasons and is not settling because
of hostility toward the grievant.
3. No. File a grievance against the harassment. A union
cannot refuse to file a grievance because it fears management’s biased
reactions. Failure to enforce the contract’s prohibition against sex
discrimination could subject the union to a DFR case at the NLRB, or
even more damaging, a civil rights lawsuit in court.
4. Yes. Probationary employees are part of the bargaining
unit. They may not be able to use the just-cause for discharge clause,
but they are usually covered by other contract provisions, such as
prohibitions against race or sex discrimination.
5. No. Swapping grievances is dangerous. The employee whose
grievance is dropped may try to establish a DFR case on the grounds
that the union represented him or her less vigorously than the other
employee. Nevertheless, if the union is certain that the second
grievant would have no chance of success at arbitration; it cannot be
faulted for making a tradeoff settlement to guarantee success on the
first employee’s grievance. (But it’s politically dangerous.)
6. No. Although union representatives are expected to act as
an employee’s advocate and to present grievances in the best possible
light, they do not have to take ridiculous positions. Prior to
arbitration, unions retain considerable discretion and may at times
openly admit that a grievance does not have merit.
7. Yes, if the union feels that the interests of the
bargaining unit as a whole require it to continue the grievance.
8. Yes. The decision to arbitrate is the unions and the
union’s alone. Individuals cannot compel arbitration by offering to
pay the expenses.
9. No. It is generally held that a union’s obligation under
the duty of fair representation extends only to contract procedures,
such as filing grievances and going to arbitration. Unions do not have
to file court appeals when they lose at arbitration.
10. He or she must file within six months. The six-month
period begins the day the employee is notified that the union has
decided not to continue the grievance. If the employee waits longer to
file, the suit would be barred by the statute of limitations. This is
an important reason why union representatives should inform employees
when grievances are dropped and should record the date of the
conversation.
11. No. DFR lawsuits may only be brought against unions.
Stewards or union officers cannot be held personally liable.
12. No. You should always grieve a discharge case. Without a
full investigation, you do not know for sure anyway who is at fault.
However, you may have grounds not to take it to arbitration.
13. Absolutely not. The union is legally required to
represent all employees in the bargaining unit whether or not they are
members. No matter how distasteful Fred’s behavior is, you must not
discriminate against him because he’s not in the union. Even "going
through the motions" could land the union in trouble.
14. Possibly, but the courts generally need more than simple
neglect to find them guilty. The standard used is that negligence must
be gross, far short of the minimum standard of fairness.